|
EPA Final Rule: Amendments to Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; Monitoring Requirements (40 CFR Part 60) January 12, 2004 [69 FR 1785] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EPA has finalized its Performance Specification 11 (PS-11): Specifications and Test Procedures for Particulate Matter (PM) Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) at Stationary Sources and Monitoring Requirements; and Procedure 2: Quality Assurance Requirements for PM CEMS at Stationary Sources. The final rule is available at EPA’s Technology Transfer Network at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/browse.html
The final rule establishes the initial installation and performance procedures that are required for evaluating the acceptability and ongoing performance of the PM CEMS. Some affected sources include power generation units and hazardous waste incinerators. There are several different types of PM CEMS technologies that are designed to sample continuously or by batch using in-situ or extractive sampling systems. Each type has site specific advantages and therefore the type selected should be appropriate for the flue gas conditions at your source. The most common types are described below:
PM CEMS Technology
Guidance for technology applications can be found in “Current Knowledge of Particulate Matter (PM) Continuous Emission Monitoring” EPA-454/R-00-039, September 2000. The following is a description of the three different measurement technology principles:
Performance Specification 11 (PS-11)
Initial PA CEMS Criteria
PA CEMS Correlation Testing
PS-11 performance procedures are based on emission correlations of PM CEM responses and emission concentrations of a reference method. This correlation is determined by conducting an initial correlation test. Using the correlation test data, the correlation is developed by regression analysis following a linear, polynominal, logarithmic, exponential, or power correlation model. Each model has its own set of equations. The correlation data collected should be representative of the full range or normal operating conditions of the source if the range of operation does vary for that source. A general summary of the criteria for correlation testing are as follows:
Procedure 2
Periodic evaluations of the PM CEMS using a combination of various quarterly audits and daily calibration procedures will ensure that the PM CEMS data quality is maintained. Sources must comply with these quality control and quality assurance measures immediately following successful completion of the correlation testing. A general summary of daily and quarterly procedures are described below:
Daily
Quarterly
An Absolute Correlation Audit (ACA) and Sample Volume Audit (SCA) must be conducted once per calendar quarter no closer than 2 months apart. A Response Correlation Audit (RCA) or a Relative Response Audit (RRA) can be conducted in place of an ACA. Key points from these audit procedures are summarized below:
ACA
SVA
RCA
· In compliance if 75% of data points are within 25% of the correlation regression line and or 9 of the 12 data points are within the output range used to develop the correlation curve. For all 12 data points, the PM CEMS response value can be no greater than the greatest response used to develop the correlation curve.
RRA
· In compliance if 2 of the 3 PM CEMS and Reference Method measurements fall within 25% of the correlation regression line and 2 of the 3 data points are within the output range used to develop the correlation curve. For all 3 data points, the PM CEMS response value can be no greater than the greatest response used to develop the correlation curve.
REPORTING
Report all drift and accuracy data of any quarterly audit along with all emissions report data in a Data Assessment Report (DAR). Keep audit, emission, and calibration data for a period of 5 years.
Author: Matthew Gregory, Project Scientist Date: 02/04/04
|