MACT FOR BOILERS AND PROCESS HEATERS

A new maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standard (Subpart DDDDD) applicable to all boilers and process heaters at major HAP sources will become effective on November 12, 2004.  Following is a summary of this new regulation that is expected to affect nearly 60,000 existing units.  It should be noted, however, that a majority of the existing units are gas-fired boilers and process heaters, which are subject only to an initial notification requirement.

Applicable Dates

Publication date:           September 13, 2004

Effective date:               November 12, 2004

Initial notice due:           March 12, 2005

Compliance date:          November 12, 2007

Subcategories

Subpart DDDDD separates boilers and process heaters into the following subcategories based on heat capacity:

bullet

Large units – greater than 10 mmBtu/hour and greater than 10% annual capacity factor.

bullet

Limited use units – greater than 10 mmBtu/hour, but less than or equal to 10% annual capacity factor.

bullet

Small units – less than or equal to 10 mmBtu/hour.

Exemptions

The following sources are exempt from Subpart DDDDD provisions, including the initial notification requirement. 

bullet

Existing and new small gas-fired units

bullet

Existing small liquid fuel-fired units

bullet

Existing small solid fuel-fired units

bullet

Hot water heaters (closed vessels with capacity of no more than 120 gallons, in which water is heated by combustion of gaseous or liquid fuel and is withdrawn for use external to the vessel), and

bullet

All boilers and process heaters that are already regulated, or will be subject to regulation, under another MACT standard.

Emission Limits

The standard contains emission limits for particulate matter, hydrogen chloride, mercury, and carbon monoxide.  The emission limits vary depending on the unit’s size category and the type of fuel burned.  Particulate matter is a surrogate for non-mercury metallic HAP emissions.  Hydrogen chloride is a surrogate for inorganic HAPs, and the carbon monoxide limits represent organic HAPs. 

An optional emission limit for “total selected metals” can be used in lieu of the particulate matter limit.  Total selected metals are defined as the sum of arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium emissions.

Existing large solid fuel-fired facilities can average their emissions over all units to demonstrate compliance, but new units must comply individually.

The standard also includes two risk-based alternatives for demonstrating compliance.  The alternatives apply to HCl and manganese emissions, and both can be demonstrated using look-up tables found in Appendix A of Subpart DDDDD.

Work Practice Standards

Carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring has been instituted as a work practice standard for certain new boilers and process heaters, as follows: 

bullet

New large and limited use units must meet a 400 ppmv CO limit

bullet

New units greater than 100 mmBtu/hr have to monitor CO emissions on a 30-day rolling average, and are required to install CEMS to show ongoing compliance

bullet

New large and limited use units that are under 100 mmBtu/hr will have to conduct annual performance tests to show compliance.

Performance Testing

Boiler and process heater units subject to an emission limit are required to conduct initial and annual performance tests.  The annual requirement can be reduced to once-per-three-years if the three preceding years of test data demonstrate compliance with all limits.

It should be noted that annual tests are not required for HCl, mercury, and total selected metals if compliance with the emission limits is demonstrated via fuel analysis.  Also, new units burning liquid fuel can avoid testing by submitting a signed statement that no residual oil will be burned.  This statement would be submitted with the notice of compliance statement (NOCS).

Monitoring

Continuous compliance can be determined directly via CEMS, or indirectly with continuous parameter monitoring systems (CPMS).  If using a CPMS, the facility must establish the appropriate operating parameters during the initial and annual performance tests.

 A site-specific monitoring plan for each CPMS must include the following: 

bullet

A requirement that measurement devices be installed in the most appropriate locations for obtaining representative readings;

bullet

Performance and equipment specifications for the sample interface, the pollutant concentration or the parametric signal analyzer, and the data collection and reduction systems;

bullet

Procedures for evaluating performance and acceptance criteria;

bullet

Operation and maintenance procedures;

bullet

Procedures for data quality assurance; and

bullet

Recordkeeping and reporting procedures.

Sources that are subject to an emission limit or work practice standard are also required to develop a start-up, shut-down, and malfunction plan (SSMP).

Recordkeeping

In addition to copies of all required reports, notices, test results, and permits, sources are required to keep records of: 

bullet

Monthly hours of operation per unit;

bullet

Monthly fuel usage for each affected boiler and process heater; and

bullet

Chlorine, mercury, and total selected metals fuel input calculations and supporting documentation, if applicable.

Notices and Reports

For sources that are not exempt from this regulation, an initial notification must be submitted to EPA no later than March 12, 2005 (120 days after the publication date).  Other required notices and reports include: 

bullet

Notice of intent to conduct a test or compliance demonstration, to be submitted at least 30 days prior to the test date;

bullet

Compliance status report (NOCS) due within 60 days of conducting the performance test or compliance demonstration;

bullet

If demonstrating compliance by emission averaging, submit a notice of intent to do at least 180 days before beginning emission averaging;

bullet

If a source is going to demonstrate compliance by using the risk-based alternatives, an advance notice of intent must be submitted (no timeframe provided); and

bullet

Semiannual compliance reports.

 

 Author:  Mark Schooley, Senior Environmental Project Manager

Date:  Sept. 2004

 Back to Articles